YARRA’S BUDGET 2005/06
A Socialist Party Contribution to the Debate Around the Budget
The Socialist Party joins Yarra residents in calling on Council to
develop a budget for the people— not a right-wing budget that spends
more on roads and consultants than on community services.
Yarra Council should be actively seeking to develop a democratic budget
that reflects the needs of ordinary people in Yarra. This means
encouraging real participation by residents, community groups and small
businesses in the development of their budget. The Yarra Council 2005/6
Draft Budget has instead been developed by council in a process that is
largely inaccessible to the people it will affect.
This leaflet outlines some ways the Socialist Party believes the budget
should be changed so it represents the real needs of the community. It
is a starting point for community debate around the Yarra Council Budget
both this year and into the future. We want to encourage all residents
and community groups in Yarra to participate in the development of their
budget. Only in this way can we have a true People’s Budget that
reflects the needs of the majority in Yarra.
The Council’s 2005/6 Draft Budget calls for:
• A 5.9% increase in rate revenue.
• $5.5 million for roads, but only $200,000 to improve family services
including childcare.
• $2.2 million on advertising, publicity and for consultants – which is
enough money to make meals on wheels free and still have
$1.7 million left over.
Yarra Council is about to present its draft budget for 2005/06. You, as
a local resident, will have only a month to have your say before
Councillors vote on it on July 12th.
A do-nothing Budget
We have great needs in Yarra, especially in childcare and on the three
massive public housing estates. Therefore you would expect big
initiatives in this budget, but there are none. Even small businesses
are not serviced properly with still no access to recycling, despite the
pro-environment claims of Yarra Council.
The small improvements in the number of child care places and on
resources to young people in need are to be welcomed – but we can do so
much more.
What Council’s Draft Budget says and what it doesn’t say
The budget proudly boasts of its good parts (many of which came from
community and Socialist Party pressure on and outside of Council) – but
there is much it doesn’t report on – for example Yarra’s vital Financial
and Crisis Counselling service is to receive only $31,000 this year
compared to $83,805 two years ago!
Where does Council get its $94 million from?
Ratepayers are being asked to fork out an extra 4.9% in rates, with 5.9%
extra to be generated in new rate revenue this year. It is ironic that
the Socialist Party is the only party opposed to the screwing of
ratepayer’s year in, year out for little in return by way of new
initiatives by Council. It seems it is easier to raise money from
ratepayers than take on the State and Federal government over cuts in
grants to Council.
Fees and fines are to go up in most cases by about 3%, although after
school care fees go up 9% per child per session.
Government grants (from State and Federal government) have been cut by
2.7% this year (page 11). This long-term cutting of Council money must
be challenged. However a Labor-led Council will not take on a State
Labor government, especially with a State election next year.
What are they spending our money on?
$60 million is for operating costs. $45 million of this is on wages but
the budget papers do not make clear how much is on the mini-army of team
leaders, coordinators and directors at Yarra, a Council that is top
heavy with management. The community wants workers on the front line –
for example there is no money for a second footpath trading officer,
leaving only the one current officer to police over 1000 businesses.
$19 million is for capital works. Many of these projects are good but in
some cases the priorities are wrong, with $5.5 million for roads, yet
only $200,000 to improve infrastructure at child care centers.
$2.7 million is for debt repayment to the banks. This is being proposed
even though Yarra hasn’t got “relatively high borrowing levels for a
Victorian metropolitan local authority”, as the budget claims. In fact
the State government recommends that total debt for a Council must be
60% of rate revenue or less – for Yarra this year it is only 29%.
While there is nothing wrong with Council reducing their debt, they have
chosen to prioritize this over providing funding for essential services
like child care, aged services and libraries.
This is just one example of how this Draft Budget puts money before people.
What could be done instead?
1. A less top heavy management structure and less spent on consultants
would free up money for more socially-useful operating costs such as job
creation for unemployed youth and lower fees for Council services.
2. A readjustment of the capital works away from roads and expensive
projects like the nearly $1 million on information systems would add
millions for use for three big projects that the Socialist Party stands
for: A new child care center, a new North Fitzroy library, and a new
indoor sports facility for Yarra. These three projects would be both a
social and economic asset to Yarra.
3. A three year debt freeze would still leave Yarra ahead of State
government guidelines and would allow about $10 million to be spent on
progressive capital works projects such as the three the Socialist Party
stands for. This is partially admitted on page 31 of the budget. Even a
slow down in debt repayment could deliver $5 million.
What are the best parts of Council’s Draft Budget?
Partially thanks to the recommendations of the Youth Advisory Committee,
which was pushed for and chaired by SP Councillor Stephen Jolly there is
new resources for holiday activities for young people in public housing;
extra vacation care places; increased occasional child care, and more.
The $100,000 for a childcare review is to be welcomed and was agreed to
as a direct result of the growing community pressure on Council to act
on the crisis. The test will come when the area of greatest need for
childcare is identified: will Council then create a new childcare center
or not?
Principles behind the Council’s Draft Budget
This budget “has been prepared on the basis of constraint” (page 9) and
its Budget Principles (page 6) include nothing about community need.
Council, despite calling itself left-wing, has prepared a right-wing
(neo-liberal) budget. Since the end of the post-war economic boom in the
early 1970s almost all western governments have begun the process of
winding back conditions won in the past. This ‘neo-liberal’ agenda has
been carried though by governments on all levels through privatization,
user pays, and cuts to services.
The fact is that though they are possibly slightly better on service
delivery; Yarra Council is fundamentally no different from other Councils.
A Socialist-led Council would shift priorities towards ordinary people
in Yarra as well as mobilising to fight the cost-shifting by government.
For more information about the Socialist Party or to find out more about
or write to SP, PO Box 1015,
Collingwood 3066. You can also visit our council website at:
socialistpartyaustralia.org/council
Socialist Party City branch meets every Tuesday at 7pm at Trades Hall,
cnr Lygon + Victoria Sts, Carlton South
Socialist Party Northern branch meets every Thursday at 7.30pm at radio
station 3CR, 21 Smith St, Fitzroy
Comrades
Last night 150 children, parents and carers gatecrashed the Yarra Council meeting at Richmond Town Hall to insist Council put the child care crisis in their Top 3 list of priorities. Channel 9 + 7 TV crews were there as well as the Herald Sun and both the local papers. It was an electric atmosphere as organiser Liz Conor gave a taste of what families are going through thanks to the child care crisis. The Greens and Socialist Party united to move an amendment to the Council's Municipal Early Years Plan, which was (prior to its amendment) a lion that roared like a mouse. Instead of being satisfied with the 42 extra places it plans for this year, the amendment will lead to Council searching immediately for new sites for new child care centers. The budget (thanks to SP pressure) includes $100,000 for a child care review to scientifical indentify the main area for the crisis in Yarra. However Liz explained that over 2000 families are on waiting lists in Yarra - information gathered by the campaign group itself.
Other issues last night included the walls around Victoria Park. Residents in Abbotsford insist they should come down and are nervous about any backtracking or stonewalling by Council, as well as poor communication from the Town Hall. This Thursday night a public meeting will be held to thrash out what we are going to do, and equally importantly when we are to do it.
The VCAT hearing on Friday over the Banco development on Smith St was discussed. I lost a vote 8-1 to get Council lawyers to oppose Banco being allowed to substitute plans at the hearing. My position reflects the views of the Collingwood Action Group and many residents. We undermine our demand for the Planning Minister Rob Hulls to 'call in' the application if we are seen to agree to Banco's outrageous tactics at VCAT. However, not for the last time, Council will be bypassed by the community when it takes the rightwing line. CAG have their own lawyer on Friday and will do the job themselves. A socialist Council would mean that community groups and residents could rely on Council to support them in struggle.
The 2005/06 budget was tabled last night for one month of public consultation. The Mayor said it was the most important decision we would make, and she is correct. It is wrong that Master Plans, MSS etc have loads of community consultation (then often ignored!) yet the budget has nowhere near the same level of effort from Council to involve the community. SP distributed its contribution on the budget debate last night (see new notice), and we will be letterboxing it far and wide. Please contact us if you can help with photocopying or letterboxing!! The vote and debate will be at next months Council meeting.
The new Code of Conduct was debated and I opposed an attempt to insert a new clause to stiffle Councillors giving their honest views to the media. It has been water-down in an amendment.
On footpath trading, it is clear that senior management have an agenda to stiffle any move to getting a second footpath trading officer for Yarra. One officer therefore covers over 1000 businesses. One Councillor openly argued for 'self regulation' - I thought that went out with the fairies and Jeff Kennett. Next month I will move a motion for a second footpath trading officer.
It is becoming increasingly clear that after a few months of shifting alliances after the November 2004 Council election, that now we are settling down to a reality of an ALP-run Council with the Socialist Party as its most consistant opponent. The Greens sway between these two parties, and often amongst themselves.
My job as the sole Socialist Party Councillor is to reflect the views of the community, offer an alternative and help residents and community groups mobilise, as we did last night. Residents in Yarra need to seriously ponder the reality of what is going on around them. At the next Council election we must get a left majority.
The Council at the moment is like a newspaper, with the senior management writing the articles and operating the printing presses, and (at best) Councillors having a role as sub-editors to articles written by someone else. The community deserve better.